Orthopedic surgery continues to expand across the United States, with a 2025 report analyzing more than 4.4 million hip and knee replacement procedures performed between 2012 and 2024. Yet while surgical techniques continue to advance, John Matthews, CEO and founder of InkWell Health, believes one of the biggest challenges begins after patients leave the hospital. 

During the weeks that follow discharge, clinicians often have limited visibility into recovery despite the fact that swelling, infection, reduced mobility, and delayed healing frequently emerge during that period. Matthews argues that improving continuous clinical insight during recovery could become one of orthopedic care’s most significant advances. 

InkWell Health is a digital health company focused on remote therapeutic monitoring for orthopedic recovery. Its platform combines a temporary smart tattoo, smartphone technology, and clinical analytics to provide medical-grade recovery data that helps healthcare providers monitor patients remotely after surgery. Matthews believes the industry’s next major advance will come from improving recovery intelligence rather than changing surgical techniques.

“The surgery is only one point in a patient’s recovery,” Matthews says. “The real opportunity begins after the patient goes home. When clinicians can see meaningful recovery data every day instead of waiting weeks for a follow-up visit, they have the opportunity to intervene earlier, personalize care, and help patients recover more safely.”

That perspective aligns with broader changes across the healthcare system. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services continues expanding value-based payment models that place greater responsibility on providers for patient outcomes throughout the recovery period, including complications and readmissions after discharge. Rather than evaluating success solely by the procedure itself, reimbursement increasingly reflects how effectively providers manage the entire episode of care, creating stronger demand for technologies that improve visibility after patients leave the hospital.

According to Matthews, traditional follow-up schedules leave clinicians making important decisions with limited objective information. Patients may attend physical therapy several times each week, but significant changes in swelling, temperature, pain, or mobility can occur between visits without immediate clinical awareness. By the time concerns become visible during a scheduled appointment, opportunities for earlier intervention may already have passed.

“Recovery should not depend on snapshots collected every few weeks,” Matthews explains. “Meaningful data allows clinicians to understand how patients are progressing day by day. That creates opportunities to adjust care plans before small issues become larger problems.”

He believes objective recovery data also creates better coordination across orthopedic care teams. Surgeons, therapists, care navigators, and other providers often contribute to the recovery process, yet each may have access to different information. Matthews argues that continuous clinical data can establish a shared understanding of how recovery is progressing, allowing decisions to be based on measurable trends rather than isolated observations.

Emerging clinical evidence also points to the growing role of continuous remote monitoring in orthopedic recovery. InkWell Health has submitted the findings of a prospective clinical study to a major orthopedic journal, where the manuscript is currently pending publication. The study followed 98 outpatient knee replacement patients and found that every participant downloaded the monitoring application, while 87.8 percent completed at least 16 monitoring sessions during the first 30 days after surgery. According to the company, the data also identified patients experiencing wound healing concerns and delayed improvements in range of motion before they returned to the hospital for treatment, while demonstrating strong patient usability and engagement.

Matthews believes those findings illustrate how continuous monitoring can complement existing clinical care rather than replace it. “Technology only matters if it helps clinicians make better decisions,” he says. “Our focus has always been on providing meaningful, actionable recovery data that supports better patient management and stronger clinical outcomes.”

From his perspective, orthopedic recovery also presents an opportunity to move beyond standardized rehabilitation pathways. Patients receiving the same procedure frequently follow similar therapy schedules despite recovering at different rates. Matthews argues that objective recovery information can help clinicians determine when patients may benefit from additional therapy, earlier intervention, or fewer unnecessary visits based on their individual progress rather than generalized timelines.

He expects that approach to become increasingly important as healthcare organizations continue balancing quality outcomes with financial sustainability. Providers face growing pressure to reduce avoidable complications while improving efficiency across the full continuum of care. Matthews believes technologies capable of generating continuous clinical intelligence will become an increasingly valuable part of achieving both objectives.

“The future of orthopedic care is about understanding recovery as it happens,” Matthews says. “When clinicians have continuous visibility into how patients are actually recovering, care becomes more personalized, more proactive, and ultimately more effective.”

As remote monitoring technologies continue evolving, Matthews expects recovery intelligence to become a routine component of orthopedic practice. From his perspective, the next decade will see post-operative care shift toward continuous, data-driven decision-making that enables providers to respond earlier, coordinate treatment more effectively, and improve outcomes long after patients leave the operating room.